systemd
systemd versus non-systemd / Miscellaneous / Find systemd dependency cycles.
systemd versus non-systemd
[edit]Kicksecure is a systemd-based distribution. Kicksecure is not anti-systemd.
The Kicksecure lead developer isn't convinced by anti-systemd arguments justifying a move to a non-systemd distribution.
Non-systemd is unsupported because no contributors support this use case.
TODO: expand
The interfaces (the way packages and distributions can place configuration files there) of
/usr/lib/systemd/system/unit-name.service(.d);
- ability to easily use capabilities and syscall filters for security hardening
- systemd tmpfiles.d
/
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/;are excellent.
The The Boot Loader Interface
![]()
LoaderSystemTokenfeature sounds excellent.Bad things:
- journal log being binary
- adding
systemdinto the names of tools such assystemd-resolved,systemd-networkdand making these systemd-dependent- systemd-boot only supporting Intel/AMD64 architectureKicksecure lead developer opinion.
See also:
Interesting
[edit]See Also
[edit]- https://forums.kicksecure.com/t/non-systemd-systemd-discussion/766

- https://forums.whonix.org/t/whonix-without-systemd/18426

We believe security software like Kicksecure needs to remain Open Source and independent. Would you help sustain and grow the project? Learn more about our 13 year success story and maybe DONATE!