Kicksecure developers have done their utmost to provide solid tools which protect online security, but no perfect solution exists to the complex security problem. Before deciding whether Kicksecure is the right platform to use, it is crucial that each individual understands the limitations of the tools offered and how to make best use of them.
Kicksecure comes with many security features. Kicksecure is Security Hardened by default and also provides extensive Documentation including a System Hardening Checklist. The more you know, the safer you can be.
Protection Against Social Engineering
Kicksecure does not protect against social engineering attacks. These attacks rely on human cognitive biases and trick people into revealing passwords or other sensitive information that allows the compromise of a target system's security. 
Other examples of social engineering include convincing someone to send a copy of logs or other information from the Kicksecure. In all cases, after trust has been established between the attacker and the victim, and sufficient information has been gathered, an exploit will be executed to perform harmful actions such as stealing personal or financial information, sabotaging the target's system, and so on. 
The best tools in maintaining security are the knowledge that comes from research and experience, and healthy skepticism towards scenarios that pose potential security threats.
Dedicated wiki page: Social Engineering.
Protection Against External Threats or User Mistakes
Obviously, Kicksecure cannot protect against external threats like people looking over the user's shoulder or gaining physical access to the machine in order to subvert the security features.
Kicksecure cant prevent people from shooting themselves in the foot, leading to inadvertent insecurity.
A man-in-the-middle attack (MitM) is a where an attacker makes independent connections with two parties and secretly relays (and potentially alters) messages between them. This is a form of active eavesdropping, since the two parties think they are communicating directly with each other and are unaware the conversation is being controlled by the attacker. 
Figure: Illustration of a MitM Attack
Even when using Tor, MitM attacks can still happen between the exit relay and the destination server. The exit relay itself can also act as a man-in-the-middle. For an example of such an attack see MW-Blog: TOR exit-node doing MITM attacks. It is worth reiterating that protecting against these attacks requires end-to-end encryption and taking extra steps to verify the server's authenticity.
Normally a server's authenticity is automatically verified by the browser using SSL/TLS certificates which are checked against a set of recognized certificate authorities (CAs). If a security exception message appears like the figure below, then this might constitute a MitM attack. The warning should not be bypassed unless there is another trusted way of checking the certificate's fingerprint with the people running the service.
Figure: An Untrusted Connection
Mozilla has an educational resource to help determine if a connection to a website is secure. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) also has an excellent interactive illustration that provides an overview of HTTP / HTTPS  connections with and without Tor, and what information is visible to various third parties.
The Fallible Certificate Authority Model
Unfortunately, the vast majority of Internet encryption relies on the CA model of trust which is susceptible to various methods of compromise. Ultimately, encryption in and of itself does not solve the authentication problem in electronic communications, as seen in the actions of advanced adversaries who have targeted and undermined this central pillar upon which the Internet relies.
For example, Verisign was hacked successfully and repeatedly in 2010, with the likely conclusion being the attackers were able to forge certificates for an unknown number of websites.
A more glaring example was the confirmation by Comodo on March 15, 2011, that a user account with an affiliate registration authority had been compromised. This is a privacy and security disaster since Comodo is a major SSL/TLS company and the breach led to the creation of a new user account that issued nine certificate signing requests for seven domains: mail.google.com, login.live.com, www.google.com, login.yahoo.com (three certificates), login.skype.com, addons.mozilla.org, and global trustee. 
Later in 2011, DigiNotar, a Dutch SSL certificate company, incorrectly issued certificates to a malicious party or parties. It later emerged that DigiNotar was apparently compromised months before, or perhaps even in May of 2009, if not earlier. Rogue certificates were issued for multiple domains, including: google.com, mozilla.org, torproject.org, login.yahoo.com and many more. 
Considering the frequency of attacks and the passage of time, there is a distinct possibility that a MitM attack might occur even when the browser is trusting a HTTPS connection. 
Depending on your personal circumstances, there are alternatives to SSL/TLS which can be considered. Unfortunately, none of them can be used as a drop-in replacement for SSL/TLS. Tools providing connection security include: Monkeysphere, Convergence, Perspectives Project.
Using Tor does not magically solve the authentication problem. Tor's distinct advantage is that by providing anonymity, it is more difficult for attackers to perform a MitM attack with a rogue SSL/TLS certificate that is targeted at just one specific individual. However, the disadvantage of Tor is that it is easier for people or organizations running malicious Tor exit relays to perform a large scale MitM attempt. Further, malicious exit nodes could perform attacks targeted at a specific server, and especially those Tor clients who happen to utilize the service.
In all cases, it is advised to use additional message encryption for email, chats and so on. It is unwise to rely on SSL/TLS alone. Relevant tools that may be useful include:
If documents are saved inside Kicksecure, they will not be encrypted by default. This is why it is recommended to apply full disk encryption on Kicksecure to protect sensitive data.
Documents created in Kicksecure may also have specific file signatures that reveal use of the platform. This issue is currently being further investigated.
Numerous file formats store hidden data or metadata inside of the files. For example, text processors or PDF files could store the author's name, the date and time of file creation, and sometimes even parts of the file's editing history. The extent of hidden data depends on the file format and the software that is used.
Image file formats like TIFF and JPEG are some of the worst offenders. For instance, when these files are created by digital cameras or mobile phones, they contain a metadata format called Exif whose defined tags can include:
- Date and time information.
- Occasionally GPS coordinates of the picture.
- Camera settings: camera model and make (including the serial number), orientation (rotation), aperture, shutter speed, focal length, metering mode and ISO speed information.
- A thumbnail for previewing the picture in file managers, on camera, or in photo editing software. Image processing software tend to keep Exif data intact.
- Copyright information.
Notably, the Internet is full of cropped or blurred images where the Exif thumbnail still contains the full original picture. Specialist software is often required to remove Exif tags before safely publishing images. 
Be aware that Kicksecure does not clear file metadata automatically. However, Kicksecure comes bundled with MAT2 -- the Metadata Anonymisation Toolkit v2 -- as part of the design goal to help protect users.
Subject: and other Header Fields of Encrypted Emails
This weakness is not related to Kicksecure or the OpenPGP protocol; it is for backwards compatibility with the original SMTP protocol. Unfortunately, no RFC standard exists yet for Subject line encryption.
TODO: investigate if this situation has improved since Thunderbird native OpenPGP support.
Those who require OpenPGP encryption with a suitable email client are recommended to use Thunderbird (Mozilla's email client), which includes a graphical front-end for using the GnuPG ("GPG") encryption program.
If weak passwords (passphrases) are used they can be easily determined by brute-force attacks, whether or not Kicksecure is installed. In essence, attackers systematically try all passwords until the correct one is found, or attempt to guess the key which is created from the password using a key derivation function (an exhaustive key search). This method is very fast for short and/or non-random passwords.
Compromised Hardware or Advanced Malware
Virtualizers like Qubes, VirtualBox and KVM cannot absolutely prevent the compromise of hardware, nor detect advanced malware. Running all activities inside VMs is a very reasonable approach. However, this only raises the bar and makes it more difficult and/or expensive to compromise the whole system. It is by no means a perfect solution. As one Google Project Zero researcher noted recently when demonstrating a VM escape in KVM: 
The bug and its exploit still serve as a demonstration that highly exploitable security vulnerabilities can still exist in the very core of a virtualization engine, which is almost certainly a small and well audited codebase. While the attack surface of a hypervisor such as KVM is relatively small from a pure LoC perspective, its low level nature, close interaction with hardware and pure complexity makes it very hard to avoid security-critical bugs. While we have not seen any in-the-wild exploits targeting hypervisors outside of competitions like Pwn2Own, these capabilities are clearly achievable for a well-financed adversary. I’ve spent around two months on this research, working as an individual with only remote access to an AMD system. Looking at the potential ROI on an exploit like this, it seems safe to assume that more people are working on similar issues right now and that vulnerabilities in KVM, Hyper-V, Xen or VMware will be exploited in-the-wild sooner or later.
Kicksecure cannot provide protection if the system's trusted computing base has been compromised by:
- Physical access and the installation of untrusted pieces of hardware (like a keylogger);
- Firmware Trojans (including BIOS/UEFI attacks); or
If the Kicksecure is affected by malware, firmware trojans or malicious hardware components, then your system will be compromised.
In the event a system compromise is strongly suspected or confirmed, the ultimate goal is to re-establish a trusted, private environment for future activities -- see Compromise Recovery for techniques to recover from host and/or Kicksecure in a VM infections.
The security of the Kicksecure platform is itself reliant upon the security of the host computer. (If Kicksecure used within VM)
Some users might run Kicksecure on top of the every day operating system inside a virtual machine without making any additional host operating system security improvements. In that case, safety is materially improved by using a dedicated host operating system solely for Kicksecure VM. For better security, this system should be configured on a computer bought solely for Kicksecure activities, and which has never been used before.
There are a number of recommendations relevant to host OS security in the following Documentation sections:
- System Configuration and Access
- Basic Security Guide.
- Advanced Security Guide.
- Computer Security Education.
The System Hardening Checklist also provides a quick and handy reference guide for specific areas of interest.
Avoid Non-Freedom Software
Always Verify Signatures
For greater system security, it is strongly recommended to avoid installing unsigned software. Always make sure that signing keys and signatures are correct and/or use mechanisms that heavily simplify and automate this process, like apt upgrades.
As a reminder, digital signatures are not a magic bullet. While they increase the certainty that no backdoor was introduced by a third party during transit, this does not mean the software is absolutely "backdoor-free". Learn more about this process and what digital signatures prove.
Kicksecure Persistence vs Live vs Amnesic
Traces of software installations, files or other user activities depend on whether or not the user is using a live operating system or Live Mode.
If any software is downloaded or used on a computer, local traces of the download, installation and use will be left on the device's mass storage device (hard drive, HDD, SSD). This normal mode of operation is referred to as "persistent mode" since any files downloaded, documents created and so on will persist after reboot.
Any created files still exist after the computer is powered-off or rebooted, unless steps are taken to securely wipe the files or otherwise remove all signs of their existence. Unless Live Mode is used, there are no preventative measures to limit what is written to disk. This can lead to evidence of activity in created files, backup files, temporary files, swap, chat history, browser history and so on.
Be aware that although Live Mode inside Kicksecure virtual machine (VM) make writes go to RAM instead of the HDD/SSD, traces of activity may be left in swap files, core dumps or via other configurations on the host. If this is a risk in your circumstances, refer to Anti-Forensics Precautions or preferably utilize Live Mode.  
It is likely most Kicksecure users are utilizing persistent mode. For this reason it is recommended to Full_Disk_Encryption. A higher level of security is afforded by encrypting everything, including data, system and swap partitions.
Refer to the Live Mode chapter for further details.
Live DVD / USB
To install Kicksecure on a USB, see: Kicksecure on USB.
Missing Kicksecure Features
Kicksecure is currently alpha quality software and missing some features, including those relating to security. While many issues listed below are planned for future implementation, a number will probably never get "fixed" because they are impossible to address in a software-only project.
Table: Missing Kicksecure Features
|Category||Missing Feature or Capability|
|Adversaries||Protect against global network adversaries.|
|AppArmor||Apply AppArmor profiles for every process or application. |
|Backdoors||Protect against hardware or software backdoors.|
|Encryption||Encrypt a user's data, documents, files and so on.|
|Hardening||Use all the possible hardening options like full PIE and grsecurity.|
|Local Adversaries||Protect against local adversaries who could mount cold boot and evil maid attacks, or otherwise compromise a user's physical machine.|
|MAC Address||Automatically protect against MAC address fingerprinting on public networks.|
|Passwords||Make weak passwords stronger.|
|Security Updates||Automatically apply security updates. This was a conscious developer decision because automated updates also come with their own set of security problems.|
|Software Attacks||Protect against highly skilled software attacks, unless Kicksecure for Qubes is utilized.|
|Stylometry||Obfuscate an individual's linguistic style to defeat stylometric analysis.|
|User Behavior||Protect those who: fail to read the Documentation, engage in unsafe behaviors, or change default settings without knowing the implications.|
|Kicksecure Builds||Have deterministic builds, see Dev/Archived Discussions. |
This list is likely incomplete. It is strongly encouraged to read the rest of the Documentation and perhaps the Design chapter to have a full overview of Kicksecure security, including the list of supported and unsupported features.
Contributors who want to help improve Kicksecure security should join the discussions on Forums.
Kicksecure is a Work in Progress
Kicksecure, as well as all the software it includes, are under continuous development and might contain programming errors or security holes -- Stay Tuned to Kicksecure development, and do not rely on the platform for strong security.
That said, Kicksecure has been developed with great care, but it is impossible to ever prove that it is absolutely free of mistakes that degrade the goals of the extended project description.
Basic functionality is built-in and Kicksecure can be used to browse the web, use email, IRC, SSH, and a host of other activities. Development is ongoing and more features are continually being added. Contributors who want to join the development process are most welcome; see Patches.
Users must be careful not to draw incorrect conclusions based on the existence of specific Kicksecure communication channels, community software utilized, applications installed on the platform, or the availability of certain wiki entries. Kicksecure tries to use concise language so that users are not misled into believing anything has been implied. Despite this effort, users will sometimes draw false conclusions in an unintended way. Consider the following hypothetical discussion.
Developer: Donations to Kicksecure are possible via Bitcoin.
Kicksecure user: Since you are knowledgeable about Bitcoin, can you also accept Monero donations?
In this case the hypothetical developer did not state "I am knowledgeable about Bitcoin", but rather concisely stated "Donations to Kicksecure are possible via Bitcoin." The conclusion drawn by the user "Since you are knowledgeable about Bitcoin" might be totally unsubstantiated.
In a similar fashion, just because Kicksecure does something -- like providing a telegram channel -- it does not follow that Kicksecure endorses it; see also Terms of Service: Non-endorsement. A list of further examples is outlined below.
Table: Facts vs. False Conclusions
|Fact ||False Conclusion ||More Information|
|Kicksecure provides a Bitcoin (BTC) donation address.||Bitcoin is anonymous.|
|Kicksecure provides a Monero (XMR) donation address.||Monero is perfect.|
|The Kicksecure website is using popular web applications (web apps) like MediaWiki, GNU Mailman and Discourse (forum software).||These are perfectly "secure" (for whatever purpose, threat model) web apps.||In an ideal world, better web apps would be used but this is not possible due to finite Kicksecure resources. To learn more, see: Privacy on the Kicksecure Website.|
|Kicksecure provides downloadable VirtualBox builds.||VirtualBox is secure.||VirtualBox isn't an ideal choice but there are reasons for maintaining VirtualBox support.|
|Kicksecure inside VMs is available for Windows hosts.||Windows is a suitable host.||Windows Hosts pose numerous security and privacy threats.|
|Kicksecure inside VMs is installable on macOS hosts.||macOS is a suitable host.||macOS Hosts pose numerous security and privacy threats.|
|Kicksecure is Freedom Software.||Kicksecure is a Freedom Software 'maximalist' project.||See also:|
|Kicksecure provides a telegram channel support channel.||Telegram is a perfect, privacy-respecting, secure messenger.||See footnote. |
|There is an official Kicksecure twitter profile.||Twitter is a safe platform to utilize.||Official Kicksecure Online Profiles|
|Kicksecure has a public forum.||The Kicksecure forum and associated comments are intended to promote free speech.||Unfortunately, running a free speech platform is a full-time job and would constitute a separate project in itself. This is simply not possible as a side project.|
|Kicksecure is Open Source.||Kicksecure must/should implement all ideas from the community.||See: Community Feedback / Patches are Welcome|
|See also: Do Not Draw Wrong Conclusions.|
It is also recommended to consult the following resources:
- list of forum posts regarding the Kicksecure project philosophy;
- Linux User Experience versus Commercial Operating Systems; and
- the underpinning Rationale for this chapter.
On top of unsubstantiated conclusions it also happens that adherence to "perfectly moral" behavior or an approved ™ set of political/ideological beliefs is expected from the Kicksecure project. However, what counts as "perfectly moral" and the path of attaining therein will always be subjective and disputed among proponents. Such demands include "don't allow running Kicksecure on Windows hosts", "don't have a twitter project account", "don't accept Bitcoin donation", "don't use centralized services such as telegram", "don't document X, because of Y". Those disagreeing with our methods and philosophy are welcome to exercise their right to fork the project under the respective licenses.
- HTTPS here refers to encrypted connections, whether it is (inferior) SSL or TLS.
- Source: Comodo: The Recent RA Compromise
- Source: The Tor Project: The DigiNotar Debacle, and what you should do about it
- This is one reason why self-authenticating onion services (.onion) connections are superior to HTTPS, because they do not rely on the flawed CA system for confirmation of the destination server.
- Quoted from wikipedia Man-in-the-middle_attack and Tor Project: Detecting Certificate Authority compromises and web browser collusion.
- For example, the XKeyscore program is actively targeting Exif information for collection.
- Unix-like operating systems also swap (move) memory pages between host RAM and the host disk, and this behavior cannot be prevented in Kicksecure in a VM. The danger is data leakage might occur and an unencrypted swap partition could reveal interesting data to an attacker or be used to store unencrypted copies of files in /tmp for later retrieval.
- Although a full system MAC policy is currently in development, see here for further details.
- Although Tor now has deterministic builds, see Bug 3688.
- Things that were really stated.
- Things which were not said or implied.
Some criticisms of Telegram.
- New releases are squished into a single commit, see: one commit.
- It is impossible to sign up without a phone number.
- There are other concerns, but they are irrelevant for illustrating the point being made here.
Kicksecure Warning wiki page Copyright (C) Amnesia <amnesia at boum dot org>
Kicksecure Warning wiki page Copyright (C) 2012 - 2023 ENCRYPTED SUPPORT LP <
@.)Please DO NOT use e-mail for one of the following reasons: Private Contact: Please avoid e-mail whenever possible. (Private Communications Policy) Leaks Submissions: No. (No Leaks Policy) Sponsored posts: No. Paid links: No. SEO reviews: No. >
This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details see the wiki source code.
This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; see the wiki source code for details.